Hey fam, I’m building an AI agent with a few small VC funds, and I’d love your honest feedback. Here’s the idea: You sign up by logging in with GitHub, granting access to your product’s code repositories, and uploading your pitch deck. An AI — trained by real VCs to think like top investors — instantly reviews your materials. If it’s a YES, your startup is routed to a network of fast-moving funds. If it’s a not yet, the system continues monitoring your codebase to track execution speed and product iteration. As momentum builds, the AI can automatically reevaluate and flip the decision to a YES. You can opt out at any time, and your code is never shared with human investors. A clear YES can unlock a $25K check (via Mercury SAFE) in under 80 minutes — and up to $500K within 8 hours. Would you sign up?

Happy to join other small VC funds if you are looking for more VCs

Candid feedback. I would personally be really cautious about giving my company’s source code to any agent owned or associated by vcs who may look at competitors etc. if on the other hand it was positioned as a third party tool that graded me and maybe gave some tips (like security issues to fix, refactoring to fix) I would think of it? But honestly, now that I think about it more, is code quality or commit speed anywhere near the major criteria in determining success? Like what happens when it was a pm who vibe coded but got traction? Or a team who games it by figuring out what commits count and doing those automatically with bots. Or just a team who hasn’t found pmf and just keeps building anyways? As an alternative, have you thought about tracking google analytics? You may be able to glean a lot from that too? I’ll finally add please take this as a sample set of 1! Others may be totally excited for this which is awesome!